Convergence of an Interesting Sequence

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Let

x_1 = 0, ~ x_2 = 0.\alpha_1, ~ x_3 = 0.\alpha_1 \alpha_2, \hdots, x_n = 0.\alpha_1 \alpha_2 \hdots \alpha_n, \hdots

be a sequence of finite binary fraction in which each successive fraction is obtained by adjoining a 0 or a 1 to its predecessor. It may sound strange, but the sequence converges. Always.

Let m>n. Then:

\displaystyle |x_m - x_n| = \left| \frac{\alpha_{n+1}}{2^{n+1}} + \hdots + \frac{\alpha_{m}}{2^{m}} \right| \leq

\displaystyle \leq \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} + \hdots + \frac{1}{2^m} =
\displaystyle = \frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{n+1} - \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{m+1}}{1-\frac{1}{2}} =
\displaystyle = \frac{1}{2^n}.

Therefore, \{x_n\} is Cauchy and hence converges.

Would you have guessed?


Simple Proof of Mixed Derivative Theorem

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Everybody knows the good old

Theorem (Mixed Derivative Theorem): If the function f : G \to \mathbb{R} is in class \mathcal{C}^{(2)} (id est, twice continuously differentiable) in an open set containing a \in G \subset \mathbb{R}^n, then:

\dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial x \partial y} = \dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial y \partial x}.

In other words, the order of differentiation does not matter. The proof of this fact is not completely trivial, though.

I would like to give a much simpler proof of this fact, which I found to be quite interesting and somewhat elegant. It relies on the theorem of Fubini. Before I write out the proof, I state the Fubini’s theorem for a two-dimensional case.

Theorem (Theorem of Fubini): Let X, Y \subset \mathbb{R} be two closed intervals. Let the function f: X \times Y \to \mathbb{R} be continuous and integrable on X \times Y. Then:

\int\limits_{X \times Y} f(x,y) ~d(x,y) = \int\limits_X \int\limits_Y f(x,y) ~~dy~dx = \int\limits_Y \int\limits_X f(x,y) ~~dx~dy.

Here d(x,y) denotes really just a product of differentials $dx$ and $dy$, but the order is not specified and not assumed. I will not state the proof (which is fairly tricky and long). Also I would like to note that this is actually one of the corollaries of Fubini’s theorem. The function f may not be continuous, but the theorem of Fubini would still hold, only in a slightly, but a little strange form. And even this generalisation of the state theorem is not exactly the theorem of Fubini, but is more properly known as “a theorem of Fubini type” for a few reasons.

We are now ready to prove the mixed derivative theorem.

Proof of Mixed Derivative Theorem: We need to show that

\dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial x \partial y} - \dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial y \partial x} = 0.

We construct the proof by finding a suitable contradiction. Suppose otherwise:

\dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial x \partial y} - \dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial y \partial x} > 0.

Since f \in \mathcal{C}^{(2)}, there is a rectangle X \times Y \ni a, such that

\dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial x \partial y} - \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial y \partial x} > 0.

Since this difference is thus a nonnegative function on X \times Y,

\int\limits_{X \times Y} \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial x \partial y} - \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial y \partial x} ~d(x,y) > 0,

\int\limits_{X \times Y} \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial x \partial y} ~d(x,y) - \int\limits_{X \times Y} \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial y \partial x} ~d(x,y) > 0.

Since both of the subintegral functions are continuous, we can apply the theorem of Fubini to obtain:

\int\limits_Y \int\limits_X \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial x \partial y} ~dx~dy - \int\limits_X \int\limits_Y \dfrac{ \partial^2 f }{\partial y \partial x} ~dy~dx > 0,

\int\limits_Y  \dfrac{ \partial f }{\partial y} ~dy - \int\limits_X \dfrac{ \partial f }{\partial x} ~dx > 0,

f - f > 0,

which is, of course, completely nonsensical. We are left to conclude that

\dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial x \partial y} = \dfrac{ \partial^2 f (a)}{\partial y \partial x}.

Quod erat demonstrandum.